NetTalk Central

Author Topic: jQuery problem in NT 6.46?  (Read 3810 times)

ccordes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 384
    • View Profile
    • Email
jQuery problem in NT 6.46?
« on: October 18, 2012, 05:23:59 AM »
Is there a new trick that this old dog must learn to make themes work in 6.46?
I have just updated a large NT app to 6.46. I have 5 sites running this server each one having its own theme.
Now I've made a new site and want to add a new theme to the mix.(My favorite feature of NT6)
So I go to Theme roller and roll up some nice color combinations, download them, drop them into my themes folder, add my standard mods and now the tabs don't work on the site.  ???
I switch back to an older theme and it works, switch the new jQ 1.9 theme - no joy.
Has something changed in jQuery 1.9? all my 1.8 themes work fine.
As part of my testing, I replace each css file in the new theme folder one by open until it broke. Seems that jquery-ui.css is the culprit.

My thought is either NT 6.46 has changed, jQuery 1.9 has changed something, or I have forgotten to throw a switch somewhere.

TIA,
Chris
Real programmers use copy con newapp.exe

Bruce

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11250
    • View Profile
Re: jQuery problem in NT 6.46?
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2012, 09:33:52 PM »
Hi Chris,

I think jQuery 1.9 has changed something - I will need to investigate further.

Cheers
Bruce



ccordes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 384
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: jQuery problem in NT 6.46?
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2012, 05:06:23 AM »
I did a Beyond Compare between the 1.8 and 1.9 - they've changed a lot!
Does NT over-write any of the jQuery css classes?
Maybe the 1.8 js parts reference css stuff that isn't there any more.
Real programmers use copy con newapp.exe

Bruce

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11250
    • View Profile
Re: jQuery problem in NT 6.46?
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2012, 07:48:03 AM »
Hi Chris,
>> Does NT over-write any of the jQuery css classes?

I think there are a couple of really minor tweaks - nothing substantial.

cheers
Bruce