SSL website not responding

[terryd]

I am on Nettalk8.56.
I did some changes to a long running SSL web application.
Testing it on my development system works fine accessing locally and accessing over my network.
I copied the exe, the web folder and the following dll's from my development folder to the live system
clarunext.dll 3/6/2015
cs_libpng.dll 22/11/2012
libeay32.dll 9/7/2015
libssl32.dll 9/7/2015
msvcr90.dll 26/10/2011 (i believe in a later version of Nettalk this has changed to msvcr120.dll
ssleay32.dll 9/7/2015

After the update I can start the application, I can see the logging screen but I am getting no response when I try to access the site.
I checked my csmessage file but no errors are thrown there.

I have got around this at the moment by changing the application back to non-ssl and restricting external use but obviously I would like to know what is happening.
Are there some tips I can use to find out what the problem is.

[Bruce]

Ha Terry - some days I just win....

>> I am on Nettalk8.56.

oh, Terry, Terry, Terry..... 8.56 is just sooooo July....

>> Are there some tips I can use to find out what the problem is.

see release notes for 8.57 ... (and the updated notes for 8.55)
http://www.capesoft.com/docs/NetTalk8/NetTalkHistory.htm

Cheers
Bruce

[terryd]

Thanks Bruce
Yes I'm on 856 because I only update over weekends and you had a slew of upgrades one after the other so I was just waiting for the regressions to disappear.
I looked at the detail tab of the properties of the dlls I copied to the live system. From the attached it is the 1.0.2d version.
If I look at the 859 version history I see the update that you added to 855 documentation about msvcr120.dll.
Unfortunately that update doesn't appear on the 856 documentation so I didn't take it into account.
I'll track down a copy of the Visual C/C++ Redistributable Package and run that.

[attachment deleted by admin]

[Bruce]

>>  so I was just waiting for the regressions to disappear.

yeah, unless the problem yu are having is one of the regressions that has been fixed <bg>..

cheers
Bruce

[terryd]

I hear what you are saying.
Unfortunately my clients don't react kindly when they get a couple hundred of their complaining that they can't do this or that which they could do lat week.
My normal principal is to update to the latest version on Friday evenings then test over the weekend before going live. However every time I went to do that someone else on this site announced a regression and another version came out to sort it out. I haven't seen any problems mentioned with 859 so I will be updating this weekend as normal.